Incognito

Eagleman argues that much of the brain’s work happens outside awareness, shaping perception and decisions before we can explain them.

Skilled actions and rapid responses can occur without a conscious account of each step.

What we experience depends on the brain’s interpretation, not simply a direct copy of outside information.

Different drives can support incompatible choices within the same person.

Brain conditions and individual histories can affect behavior in ways an observer cannot readily see.

Eagleman asks how biological explanations should inform responses to harmful behavior.

• His proposed legal implications are arguments, not an automatic exemption from accountability.