LV2 · Toolooo Standard
AI Project Pricing Lab
Compare AI-assisted effort with the risk, review, and support you still own.
AI can reduce execution time while you still own the result. Compare your implementation estimate with the work and uncertainty around it, using your own hourly baseline.
Compare the same implementation scope. Keep review/handoff, support, and extra contingency outside both implementation estimates to avoid double counting. Currency is a label; no conversion occurs. Leave the rate blank to work in hours only.
What surrounds the implementation?
Support effort = weeks × your hours/week allowance. This covers expected work, not continuous availability. Set weeks to 0 for no included support.
Dependencies, ownership & reserve assumptions
The default range adds disclosed scenario allowances to implementation hours. Use your own range if you have better project evidence or if the factors overlap.
Time shrinks. The whole commitment may not.
The first two bars compare implementation only. The working-scope bars add the explicitly listed delivery allowances. All bars use the same hours scale.
38.8–49.6 hours × USD 60/hour. This is a scope-and-contingency planning range, not a market price, a probability interval, or a promise that overruns stop here.
Responsibility stays visible: high
Qualitative context, with no money multiplier: any full architecture ownership, core-business impact, or operational ownership makes this panel “High”; shared ownership, bounded support, or important workflow impact makes it “Moderate”; otherwise it is “Limited.” Faster implementation does not change those commitments. Business value needs a conversation about outcomes, alternatives, and accountability.
Show every number in the range
Each row contributes the listed percentage of AI-assisted implementation hours. Percentages are added once, never compounded, and are not applied to review or support.
| Factor | Selected assumption | Lower | Upper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project complexity | Several moving parts | 5% | 15% |
| Requirements clarity | Clear acceptance criteria | 0% | 5% |
| Revision risk | Some iteration expected | 5% | 15% |
| Third-party dependencies | Few / stable | 0% | 5% |
| Deadline pressure | Comfortable | 0% | 0% |
| Client collaboration burden | Regular coordination | 5% | 10% |
| Estimate uncertainty | Some unknowns | 5% | 15% |
These are illustrative planning coefficients, not measured failure rates or market research. Related factors can overlap; use your own contingency range to reflect your evidence. Deadline allowance represents possible coordination/rework effort, not a rush-price rule. Architecture ownership, criticality, and post-launch responsibility add no automatic fee. Taxes, software, hosting, subcontractors, margin, and availability premiums are not added.
Before you quote · 0/7 considered
This checklist stays in this tab and resets when the scenario changes. It is a planning aid, not a guarantee of project or pricing outcomes.
Understand AI Project Pricing Lab
What this tool helps you understand
Use your own effort estimates and hourly baseline to compare straightforward time costing with a transparent contingency range. Explore revisions, uncertainty, review, support, and ownership without treating AI speed as a universal project price.
When to use it
Use AI Project Pricing Lab when freelance, ai, and money work raises questions about AI project pricing, freelance quote planning, and risk-adjusted effort and you need a concrete view before making the next move.
How to read the result
Treat the leading option as the best fit for the priorities you selected. Review the score breakdown before acting because changing those priorities can change the result.
Assumptions and limits
The range depends on your effort, rate, review, revision, support, and uncertainty inputs. It does not know the client relationship, market, contract, taxes, or final commercial risk.
Toolooo is part of Khizooology, created byKhizar Imtiaz (khizooo).