🏗️
⚖️ Decide
LV2 · Toolooo Standard
Explore → See → Understand → ActUnderstand it. Feature Level describes the depth of the tool experience.

Build vs Buy

Weigh building a feature in-house against buying a third-party service, scored against your own priorities.

EngineeringProjectsMoney

The numbers: cost over time

One-time setup versus ongoing fees — see when, if ever, one path becomes cheaper than the other.

$/hr
hrs
hrs
$/yr
hrs/yr
hrs/yr
Yr 1Yr 2Yr 3Yr 5Break-even ~Yr 3.4$71,900$0
Build in-houseBuy / integrateBreak-even
Build — Year 1
$34,000
Buy — Year 1
$17,100
Build — Year 3
$47,600
Buy — Year 3
$44,500
Break-even
Year 3.4
Build in-house is cheaper after this point

Simplified, linear model — assumes steady maintenance hours and a flat license price over time. Treat the break-even year as a rough signal, not a forecast.

The priorities: how each path scores

Cost is only one lens — weigh it against control, speed to ship, and ongoing maintenance overhead below.

How much do you care about each of these?

5
5
5
5
Buy / integrate6.8 / 10
Build in-house5.0 / 10

For the priorities you selected, Buy / integrate scores highest — driven mostly by speed to ship.

What would change this: Build in-house scores higher on control & customization — raise that priority enough and it can overtake Buy / integrate.

DimensionYour weightBuy / integrate
Cost Efficiency5/107/10
Control & Customization5/104/10
Speed to Ship5/109/10
Low Ongoing Maintenance5/107/10
Where do these scores come from?

Editorial 0–10 assumptions based on general build-vs-buy tradeoffs — building typically wins on control but loses on speed and maintenance burden; buying is usually the reverse. Your specific situation (team size, budget, how core this is to your product) can easily flip these.

Understand Build vs Buy

What this tool helps you understand

Set your priorities across cost, control, speed to ship, and ongoing maintenance, and get a transparent, weighted comparison of building the feature yourself versus integrating an existing service.

When to use it

Use Build vs Buy when engineering, projects, and money work raises questions about build vs buy, make or buy decision, and third party vs in house and you need a concrete view before making the next move.

How to read the result

Treat the leading option as the best fit for the priorities you selected. Review the score breakdown before acting because changing those priorities can change the result.

Assumptions and limits

The comparison uses transparent editorial scores and the priorities you choose. It supports a decision; it does not prove that one technology or approach is objectively best.